Current:Home > MyExxon Relents, Wipes Oil Sands Reserves From Its Books -Quantum Capital Pro
Exxon Relents, Wipes Oil Sands Reserves From Its Books
View
Date:2025-04-14 18:04:06
ExxonMobil announced Wednesday that it had wiped off its books all 3.5 billion barrels of tar sands oil reserves at one of its projects in Canada. Because of recent low oil prices, the company said none of those reserves can be considered economical according to the accounting rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The accounting change at its Kearl project, a momentous if expected development, represented a turnaround for the company, which has long resisted calls to revise its reserves estimates. Over the past decade, Exxon had steadily increased its holdings in Canada’s tar sands to become a leading producer there.
Exxon also removed from its books 800 million barrels of oil-equivalent reserves in North America, though the reductions were offset by the addition of 1 billion barrels of oil and gas elsewhere.
Exxon said in October that low prices would likely force it to “de-book” up to 4.6 billion barrels of reserves in its end-of-year accounting. Securities and Exchange Commission rules allow oil companies to count reserves only if they are profitable based on average prices over the previous year.
But while the accounting change removes billions of dollars worth of tar sands investments from the company’s annual report, and is watched closely by investors, it will not directly affect operations. Exxon plans to continue operating its Kearl project, and said it will add back the reserves if oil prices rise or costs drop. After the reduction, the company now reports holding 1.3 billion barrels of tar sands reserves.
Exxon will hold an analyst meeting on March 1.
Earlier this week, ConocoPhillips said it had reduced its oil sands reserves by more than 1 billion barrels, bringing its total to 1.2 billion for 2016. These moves had been expected, as low oil prices have placed a heavy burden on tar sands projects, which are among the most expensive and polluting sources of oil.
veryGood! (9483)
Related
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- UFC Fighter Conor McGregor Denies Sexually Assaulting Woman at NBA Game
- Air Pollution From Raising Livestock Accounts for Most of the 16,000 US Deaths Each Year Tied to Food Production, Study Finds
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $400 Satchel Bag for Just $89
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- Post Election, Climate and Racial Justice Protesters Gather in Boston Over Ballot Counting
- Abortion pills should be easier to get. That doesn't mean that they will be
- How Olivia Wilde Is Subtly Supporting Harry Styles 7 Months After Breakup
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- At One of America’s Most Toxic Superfund Sites, Climate Change Imperils More Than Cleanup
Ranking
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- A Black 'Wall Street Journal' reporter was detained while working outside a bank
- Listener Questions: Airline tickets, grocery pricing and the Fed
- Ryan Reynolds, Bruce Willis, Dwayne Johnson and Other Proud Girl Dads
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Southwest Airlines' holiday chaos could cost the company as much as $825 million
- BP Pledges to Cut Oil and Gas Production 40 Percent by 2030, but Some Questions Remain
- Big Oil Took a Big Hit from the Coronavirus, Earnings Reports Show
Recommendation
Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
From East to West On Election Eve, Climate Change—and its Encroaching Peril—Are On Americans’ Minds
New York opens its first legal recreational marijuana dispensary
Solar Power Just Miles from the Arctic Circle? In Icy Nordic Climes, It’s Become the Norm
B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
The never-ending strike
Sony says its PlayStation 5 shortage is finally over, but it's still hard to buy
Flight fare prices skyrocketed following Southwest's meltdown. Was it price gouging?