Current:Home > NewsDenmark’s parliament adopts a law making it illegal to burn the Quran or other religious texts -Quantum Capital Pro
Denmark’s parliament adopts a law making it illegal to burn the Quran or other religious texts
Indexbit View
Date:2025-04-10 13:41:04
COPENHAGEN, Denmark (AP) — A new law was passed in Denmark’s parliament on Thursday that makes it illegal to desecrate any holy text in the country, after a recent string of public desecrations of the Quran by a handful of anti-Islam activists sparked angry demonstrations in Muslim countries.
The Scandinavian nation has been viewed abroad as a place that facilitates insults and denigration of the cultures, religions and traditions of other countries. The purpose of the law was to counter “the systematic mockery” which, among other things, has contributed to intensifying the threat of terrorism in Denmark, the justice ministry has said.
The Folketing, or parliament, adopted the law in a 94-77 vote, with eight lawmakers absent. The new legislation will make it a crime “to inappropriately treat, publicly or with the intention of dissemination in a wider circle, a writing with significant religious significance for a religious community or an object that appears as such.” Works of art where “a minor part” includes a desecration, but is part of a larger artistic production, isn’t covered by the ban.
During the more than four-hour debate, left-leaning and far-right parties united against the center-right government, repeatedly demanding that the three-party coalition that presented the draft on Aug. 25, take part in the discussion. The government didn’t say anything and were called “cowards” by the opposition.
“Does Iran change its legislation because Denmark feels offended by something an Iranian could do? Does Pakistan? Does Saudi Arabia? The answer is no,” Karina Lorentzen of the Socialist People’s Party asked rhetorically. Inger Støjberg of the anti-immigration Denmark Democrats said that the new law was a capitulation to Islam and a bowing down to countries that “do not share (our) set of values.”
“A restriction of freedom of expression is wrong in a modern and enlightened society like the Danish one,” Støjberg said.
This year alone, activists have staged more than 500 protests, including burnings of the Quran, in front of embassies of Muslim countries, places of worship and in immigrant neighborhoods.
Denmark has repeatedly distanced itself from the desecrations, but has insisted that freedom of expression is one of the most important values in Danish society. The government has said there must “be room for religious criticism” and that there were no plans to reintroduce a blasphemy clause that was repealed in 2017.
In 2006, Denmark was at the center of widespread anger in the Muslim world after a Danish newspaper posted 12 cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, including one wearing a bomb as a turban. Muslims consider images of the prophet to be sacrilegious and encouraging idolatry. The images escalated into violent anti-Denmark protests by Muslims worldwide.
Those who violate the new law face fines or up to two years in prison. Before it takes effect, Denmark’s figurehead monarch Queen Margrethe needs to formally sign it. That is expected to happen later this month.
veryGood! (1884)
Related
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- This winter's U.S. COVID surge is fading fast, likely thanks to a 'wall' of immunity
- In U.S. Race to Reap Offshore Wind, Ambitions for Maryland Remain High
- 2016: Canada’s Oil Sands Downturn Hints at Ominous Future
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- See Blake Lively Transform Into Redheaded Lily Bloom in First Photos From It Ends With Us Set
- The FDA considers a major shift in the nation's COVID vaccine strategy
- We asked, you answered: More global buzzwords for 2023, from precariat to solastalgia
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Total to Tender for Majority Stake in SunPower
Ranking
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- A single-shot treatment to protect infants from RSV may be coming soon
- Florida Fracking Ban Bill Draws Bipartisan Support
- Anne Heche Laid to Rest 9 Months After Fatal Car Crash
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Climate Activist Escapes Conviction in Action That Shut Down 5 Pipelines
- Members of the public explain why they waited for hours to see Trump arraigned: This is historic
- The FDA considers a major shift in the nation's COVID vaccine strategy
Recommendation
The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
At Davos, the Greta-Donald Dust-Up Was Hardly a Fair Fight
New York City’s Solar Landfill Plan Finds Eager Energy Developers
As electric vehicles become more common, experts worry they could pose a safety risk for other drivers
Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
Today's Hoda Kotb Says Daughter Hope Has a Longer Road Ahead After Health Scare
The EPA Once Said Fracking Did Not Cause Widespread Water Contamination. Not Anymore
A baby spent 36 days at an in-network hospital. Why did her parents get a huge bill?