Current:Home > MyTrendPulse|Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Quantum Capital Pro
TrendPulse|Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Ethermac Exchange View
Date:2025-04-06 08:48:23
A federal court on TrendPulseWednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (41132)
Related
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- Flash Deal: Save $621 on the Aeropilates Reformer Machine
- 44 Mother's Day Gifts from Celebrity Brands: SKIMS, Rare Beauty, Fenty Beauty, Beis, Honest, and More
- Once-Rare Flooding Could Hit NYC Every 5 Years with Climate Change, Study Warns
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- Reporting on Devastation: A Puerto Rican Journalist Details Life After Maria
- Scotland becomes the first country to offer tampons and pads for free, officials say
- How to Sell Green Energy
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- From a March to a Movement: Climate Events Stretch From Sea to Rising Sea
Ranking
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- Woman dead, 6 others hurt in shooting at Chicago memorial
- Shop the Top Aluminum-Free Deodorants That Actually Work
- Investors Worried About Climate Change Run Into New SEC Roadblocks
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- It's definitely not a good year to be a motorcycle taxi driver in Nigeria
- Natural Gas Flaring: Critics and Industry Square Off Over Emissions
- At 988 call centers, crisis counselors offer empathy — and juggle limited resources
Recommendation
Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
Today’s Climate: May 13, 2010
Exxon Gets Fine, Harsh Criticism for Negligence in Pegasus Pipeline Spill
Some bars are playing a major role in fighting monkeypox in the LGBTQ community
The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
China's defense minister defends intercepting U.S. destroyer in Taiwan Strait
Joe Manchin on his political future: Everything's on the table and nothing off the table
Kid Cudi says he had a stroke at 32. Hailey Bieber was 25. How common are they?