Current:Home > NewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Quantum Capital Pro
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-17 18:53:23
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (2)
Related
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- TikTok ban: Justice Department, ByteDance ask appeals court to fast-track decision
- American who disappeared in Syria in 2017 presumed dead, daughter says
- After the only hospital in town closed, a North Carolina city directs its ire at politicians
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- Taylor Swift pauses acoustic set of Stockholm Eras Tour show to check on fans
- Simone Biles is a lock for Paris Olympics. But who's going to join her?
- The Torture and Killing of a Wolf, a New Endangered Species Lawsuit and Novel Science Revive Wyoming Debate Over the Predator
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Georgia freshman wide receiver arrested for reckless driving
Ranking
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
- 'Dumb and Dumber': Jeff Daniels feared flushing away his career with infamous toilet scene
- 'SNL': Jake Gyllenhaal sings Boyz II Men as Colin Jost, Michael Che swap offensive jokes
- Disneyland's character performers vote to unionize
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Lainey Wilson the big winner at 2024 Academy of Country Music Awards
- Kyle Richards Shares a Surprisingly Embarrassing Moment From Real Housewives of Beverly Hills
- Sportswear manufacturer Fanatics sues Cardinals rookie WR Marvin Harrison Jr., per report
Recommendation
Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
Benedictine Sisters condemn Harrison Butker's speech, say it doesn't represent college
Why tech billionaires are trying to create a new California city
Mayoral candidate, young girl among 6 people shot dead at campaign rally in Mexico
As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
Stock market today: Asian stocks advance after Wall Street closes out another winning week
The video of Diddy assaulting Cassie is something you can’t unsee. It’s OK not to watch.
TikTok ban: Justice Department, ByteDance ask appeals court to fast-track decision