Current:Home > FinanceTrue-crime junkies can get $2,400 for 24 hours of binge-watching in MagellanTV contest -Quantum Capital Pro
True-crime junkies can get $2,400 for 24 hours of binge-watching in MagellanTV contest
View
Date:2025-04-13 15:27:09
Love true crime? Want to get paid watching it?
MagellanTV recently announced its 4th Annual True Crime Watch Dream Job offering one lucky true-crime fan $2,400 to binge-watch certain shows.
The catch? The person has to watch it 24 hours straight.
Here's what to know about the gig:
'He will kill again':With Rachel Morin's killer still at large, Maryland officials sound alarm
Job duties
According to the job posting, the company's ideal candidate "lives for true crime."
"They can handle the most menacing serial killer, the goriest details, and don’t flinch at the chilling paranormal - they love it so much that they’re willing to stream it nonstop," the post reads.
In addition to watching true crime, job requirements include documenting the true crime 'all-nighter' on social media.
Only one person will hired for the job, the posting reads, but the company said it will give 100 runner-up applicants a free three-month membership to MagellanTV.
What shows will I watch if hired for the job?
The dream job playlist for a person with "nerves of steel' includes shows like 'Lifers', 'Mafia Queens' and 'The Killer Nurse'.
The application requires a person to explain why the company should hire you and submit how often you watch true crime and why.
Escaped PA killer update:Escaped killer Danelo Cavalcante now armed with rifle stolen from home: Live updates
Where to apply for true-crime binge job
Want the gig?
"Post about the dream job on social media with the hashtag #truecrimedreamjob, tag us, and tell us why you’re the person for the job!" Magellen's listing reads.
Hurry up and apply though. The window to apply closes at 10 a.m. EST on Friday.
To apply click here.
Natalie Neysa Alund is a senior correspondent for USA TODAY. Reach her at [email protected] and follow her on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter @nataliealund.
veryGood! (627)
Related
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- NPR quits Twitter after being falsely labeled as 'state-affiliated media'
- Chipotle and Sweetgreen's short-lived beef over a chicken burrito bowl gets resolved
- Gen Z is the most pro union generation alive. Will they organize to reflect that?
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- Biden Could Score a Climate Victory in a Single Word: Plastics
- Travis Scott Will Not Face Criminal Charges Over Astroworld Tragedy
- Full transcript of Face the Nation, July 23, 2023
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Jaden Smith Says Mom Jada Pinkett Smith Introduced Him to Psychedelics
Ranking
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- Gas Stoves in the US Emit Methane Equivalent to the Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Half a Million Cars
- ‘Delay is Death,’ said UN Chief António Guterres of the New IPCC Report Showing Climate Impacts Are Outpacing Adaptation Efforts
- Security guard killed in Portland hospital shooting
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Where Are Interest Rates Going?
- How one small change in Japan could sway U.S. markets
- Activists Deplore the Human Toll and Environmental Devastation from Russia’s Unprovoked War of Aggression in Ukraine
Recommendation
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
Conservation has a Human Rights Problem. Can the New UN Biodiversity Plan Solve it?
How one small change in Japan could sway U.S. markets
Judge rebukes Fox attorneys ahead of defamation trial: 'Omission is a lie'
Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
GOP governor says he's urged Fox News to break out of its 'echo chamber'
Oil and Gas Companies ‘Flare’ or ‘Vent’ Excess Natural Gas. It’s Like Burning Money—and it’s Bad for the Environment
It cost $22 billion to rescue two failed banks. Now the question is who will pay